The Friendly Atheist found this on the website of New York 21st Congressional District Republican challenger Ted Danz. Here’s another one that needs a lesson in the Constitution:
I am opposed to same sex marriage. Marriage is a term that should only be used to define the religious union between one man and one woman.
In other words, the only kind of marriage he would recognize is a religious marriage. Well that’s going to disqualify a lot of marriages in this country. Why are these goobers unable to draw a distinction between government and religion? Are they really that stupid?
As a gay man I am totally opposed to the term "civil union". Whether it is a civil marriage or a religious marriage, that is the term we should use and strive for in the gay rights movement. Since this country was founded on the separation of church and state, I am not only sick and tired, but appalled by the constant "religious" definitions of marriage. Frankly my dear I don't give a damn what YOUR religion calls a marriage!
ReplyDeleteThe Reform Deist